Supervisors, School Board Grapple with Budget Shortfalls

Facing hundreds of millions in deficits in Fiscal Year 2014, Fairfax County leaders try to plan around federal sequestration, unpredictable revenue.

As the leaders of Fairfax County and its school system sat together Tuesday to stare down upcoming fiscal years threatened by larger-than-normal deficits and the potential impact of sequestration, both groups agreed they would have to take a new approach in future budget cycles, one that relies less on what has been done in the past and more on multi-year budgeting and reprioritizing wants and needs — a "new way of doing business."

"I think we have to look at things very differently and we have to be willing to take some risk on things we haven't done before," County Executive Ed Long said during a joint meeting Tuesday between the Board of Supervisors and Fairfax County School Board.

Combined with the loss of $61 million in one-time money the county used in fiscal year 2013, and projected dollar increases in spending — including in funds for schools, compensation and debt services — the county faces a shortfall of nearly $170 million in fiscal year 2014.

For more budget information, click here.

The school system itself faces a projected deficit of $93.7 million, not including another $68.4 million shortfall in "significant program needs," including restoring class-size reduction, extended teacher contracts, restoring clinical staffing, introducing more online and print textbooks and major and preventive maintenance.

The county anticipates being able to give the school system a $84.2 million increase in fiscal year 2014, about half of the $162 million the school system needs, according to budget documents.

The projections, of course, do not include any impacts federal sequestration will have on the county's credit rating — which could be downgraded depending on how and if Congress acts, Moody's Investor Services told Long — or access to funding.

The county currently relies heavily on at least $122 million in federal money, in federal grants, general fund contributions and funding toward housing assistance, aging grants and community services. Schools receive about $76.7 million in federal money for its operation fund and $35.6 million in grants, along with $26.6 million for its food and nutrition program, according to budget documents.

While personal property revenue is expected to rise 6.5 percent this fiscal year, and real estate tax revenue will rise about 3.3 percent, both of those areas — and all other revenue categories — will see less or no growth in fiscal year 2014, according to county projections.

And while Long expects the county will benefit from development along the Silver Line and in Tysons, among other projects like Mosaic, BRAC and the Springfield Mall redevelopment, the effects likely won't be seen until fiscal year 2016 or 2017.

"The best-case scenario for us is Congress is able to do something by the end of the year ... the sooner we know the better and the faster we'll be able to react," Long said. "Until then, we're all captive audience waiting to see what happens. These numbers could very well get worse."

Planning for the Unknown

As question marks pop up in place of dollar signs in state and federal categories, county and schools leaders are trying to find new ways to generate solutions.

For the county, that could mean both reductions — cutting department and agency budgets based on suggestions that come from a charge by Long to find 5 percent in savings next year — holding off on compensation increases for county staff and new approaches, such as exploring multi-level police and fire departments and new school buildings, as the county is in Tysons.

For the school system that could mean a flat transfer from the county or, as suggested by School Board member Elizabeth Schultz (Springfield), keeping the school transfer consistent as a frozen percentage of the county budget. Currently, the transfer to county schools makes up about 52.2 percent of the county's annual expenditures.

Schultz also suggested repurposing some of the county's vacant office space for educational uses, because the school system is at its borrowing capacity for renovations and lacks land and funds to build new schools.

The system is working with the state on an efficiency audit, which studies management of non-school based departmental efficiencies. Superintendent Jack Dale said those results will not be available until sometime next spring, but savings could amount to $10 million.

The school system has already frozen non-essential travel, Dale said. In September, he asked each of his departments to identify the consequences of a 5 percent non-school based reduction.

County supervisors told the school board it needed clear priorities — a discussion school board members have grappled with this fall as they try to define true needs versus wants.

One of them, said supervisor John Cook (Braddock), should not be any expansion of programs, noting the restructuring of Advanced Academic Placement Centers seemed like something that could be put on the backburner.

Dale said the realignment would bring cost savings.

Schultz noted there is a high comfort with county services, provided through both the county and the schools, "but this is going to be the beginning of some very difficult establishment of priorities and where we can provide and shine ... and where we [just don't have the money]."

The county held several community meetings in November that allowed residents to give input on how to close projected deficits; an online survey about the issue is open until Friday.

Dale will propose a fiscal year 2014 budget to the school board Jan. 10. Long will propose a county spending plan Feb. 26 to the Board of Supervisors.

See also:

Fairfax Schools Face Nearly $150M Deficit in 2014

Fairfax Board Auditor to Look at FY2014 Park Reductions

Fairfax County to Hold Meetings on FY2014-15 Budget

County Faces $3 Billion Transportation Gap

Fairfax Asks Governor for Human Services Funds

Dave Webster November 30, 2012 at 04:23 PM
As noted in the article, education accounts for about 52.2% of general fund expenditures. Fire and police come in at 12.4%. Any significant reduction in spending would have to come from these two areas. I don't think anyone is willing to cut education expenditures significantly. Incidentally, if you take a look at Mr. Long's Executive Presentation, he appears to be saying that everything has been looked at in the budget cutting process. Page 10 of this presentation is titled "We've Turned Over Every Rock." As Forrest Gump said: "I guess sometimes there just aren't enough rocks." Here is a link to the presentation: http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/dmb/fy2014/fy14-15-county-budget-forecast.pdf I strongly disagree with Mr. Long that development along the Silver Line will bring in enough revenues for the County to add to the general fund by 2016 or 2017. As soon as the Silver Line is completed and is operational, Fairfax County will be required to pay into the Metro system a percentage of maintenance/operation costs. I don't think the additional revenue from tax dolars will be enough to offset the maintenance/operation costs which have to be added to any Silver Line construction costs that exceed the limit of the Phase 2 tax districts, i.e. $330,000,000. See this morning's Washington Post for an article on unexpected maintenance/operation costs. http://tinyurl.com/cdhenug The Silver Line should be, in the best case scenario, revenue-neutral for years to come.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »